From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gegvH-0000vy-8G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:51:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gegvE-00066w-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:51:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gegvD-00066g-Oc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:50:59 -0500 References: <20181215120353.82786-1-liq3ea@163.com> <20181215120353.82786-2-liq3ea@163.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <96f02ace-df12-4788-bc03-336bf610898c@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:50:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181215120353.82786-2-liq3ea@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] tests: vhost-user-test: initialize 'fd' in chr_read List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Li Qiang , lvivier@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com Cc: liq3ea@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2018-12-15 13:03, Li Qiang wrote: > Currently when processing VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_CALL > if 'qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds' get no fd, the 'fd' will > be a stack uninitialized value. > > Signed-off-by: Li Qiang > --- > tests/vhost-user-test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/vhost-user-test.c b/tests/vhost-user-test.c > index 45d58d8ea2..86039e61e0 100644 > --- a/tests/vhost-user-test.c > +++ b/tests/vhost-user-test.c > @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static void chr_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t *buf, int size) > CharBackend *chr = &s->chr; > VhostUserMsg msg; > uint8_t *p = (uint8_t *) &msg; > - int fd; > + int fd = -1; > > if (s->test_fail) { > qemu_chr_fe_disconnect(chr); > Shouldn't we also rather check the return code of qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfds() ? Anyway, initializing fd to -1 here sounds like a good idea, so: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth