From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4E3p-0008B2-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:08:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4E3o-0002c6-QM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:08:21 -0400 References: <1493411622-5343-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1493411622-5343-15-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <972a9484-fa2e-620f-35b3-de3919b587d4@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:08:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1493411622-5343-15-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TLDjXi5ooCgPLlmvjob7RnnjEJr79sF7D" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 14/34] iotests: Launch qemu-nbd with -e 42 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TLDjXi5ooCgPLlmvjob7RnnjEJr79sF7D From: Eric Blake To: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Message-ID: <972a9484-fa2e-620f-35b3-de3919b587d4@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 14/34] iotests: Launch qemu-nbd with -e 42 References: <1493411622-5343-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1493411622-5343-15-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1493411622-5343-15-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/28/2017 03:33 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > From: Max Reitz >=20 > There is no reason for the qemu-nbd server used for tests not to accept= > an arbitrary number of clients. In fact, test 181 will require it to > accept two clients at the same time (and thus it fails before this > patch). Quick question: Is this mention of test 181 the same test that occurs earlier in the pull request as 8/34? If so, should the series have been reordered for bisectability? If not, should the commit message be touched up? At any rate, bisectability of qemu-iotests is less of a concern than bisectability of 'make check' success, so I don't think your answer invalidates the pull request. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org --TLDjXi5ooCgPLlmvjob7RnnjEJr79sF7D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZA71PAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqdrIH/22BnvMhnilQqBGC0d6PB2Ed 6kTH7fHo2onzAwPkWsnne8AWC6PN+6lBVRBl4sVMqdUzAFuLMIRCYChiPZJDmGKP iX3uiXRCtbl0EgXDD+93HhWwMDyUE0mfMP4BJsSguMHr1km7tN8s+aTpsnLg9qUk RJq7Hh3/HNTRRg1xfuOWg3IDNH5DykY4LFi5nOfsCuuXTjsK50WuQCLVUjabSc2r rnv9JggkKUr7HUuqaKdzgEUEPvBGxjHhwCSE03s7ygT1BUhx22QzMUkPzxDp+efp KsFP4+ZBcSVyIplBPsg/6R1tZIK6ea9/ZeHzdr40LoQUgMo9nUjHIJN7HyRhfvA= =nNZr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TLDjXi5ooCgPLlmvjob7RnnjEJr79sF7D--