From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czDQ9-0003xt-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:26:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czDQ8-0004iQ-C8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 22:26:41 -0400 References: <20170410022636.29925-1-famz@redhat.com> <20170410160417.GH3214@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <0800f14a-4b80-9bed-bf2a-41f177ffff64@redhat.com> <20170413072137.GA7585@lemon> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <9771d4cd-3da7-93da-19db-5fe9afb49dcf@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:26:24 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170413072137.GA7585@lemon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] block: Quiesce old aio context during bdrv_set_aio_context List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Ed Swierk , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , Eric Blake On 13/04/2017 15:21, Fam Zheng wrote: > Paolo, maybe you want to submit a formal patch for 2.10? (Sorry for the > confusion, these series of mine went a bit messy.) Yes, will do. Or just submit the alternative fix that is mentioned in the comment. Paolo