qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Cedric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] vfio/iommufd: Don't fail to realize on IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO failure
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:29:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <97858274-3e67-4908-8119-a1ef9b6a092f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB6744E07A01918228E5F4068792A42@SJ0PR11MB6744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 10/07/2024 03:53, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] vfio/iommufd: Don't fail to realize on
>> IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO failure
>>
>> On 09/07/2024 12:45, Joao Martins wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2024 09:56, Joao Martins wrote:
>>>> On 09/07/2024 04:43, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>>>>> Hi Joao,
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] vfio/iommufd: Don't fail to realize on
>>>>>> IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO failure
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mdevs aren't "physical" devices and when asking for backing IOMMU
>> info, it
>>>>>> fails the entire provisioning of the guest. Fix that by filling caps info
>>>>>> when IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO succeeds plus discarding the error we
>> would
>>>>>> get into
>>>>>> iommufd_backend_get_device_info().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>>>>> Fixes: 930589520128 ("vfio/iommufd: Implement
>>>>>> HostIOMMUDeviceClass::realize() handler")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 12 +++++-------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>>>>> index c2f158e60386..a4d23f488b01 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>>>>>> @@ -631,15 +631,13 @@ static bool
>>>>>> hiod_iommufd_vfio_realize(HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, void *opaque,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     hiod->agent = opaque;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -    if (!iommufd_backend_get_device_info(vdev->iommufd, vdev-
>>> devid,
>>>>>> -                                         &type, &data, sizeof(data), errp)) {
>>>>>> -        return false;
>>>>>> +    if (iommufd_backend_get_device_info(vdev->iommufd, vdev-
>>> devid,
>>>>>> +                                         &type, &data, sizeof(data), NULL)) {
>>>>>
>>>>> This will make us miss the real error. What about bypassing host
>> IOMMU device
>>>>> creation for mdev as it's not "physical device", passing corresponding
>> host IOMMU
>>>>> device to vIOMMU make no sense.
>>>>
>>>> Yeap -- This was my second alternative.
>>>>
>>>> I can add an helper for vfio_is_mdev()) and just call
>>>> iommufd_backend_get_device_info() if !vfio_is_mdev().  I am assuming
>> you meant
>>>> to skip the initialization of HostIOMMUDeviceCaps::caps as I think that
>>>> initializing hiod still makes sense as we are still using a
>>>> TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD_VFIO somewhat?
>>>>
>>> Something like this is what I've done with this patch, see below. I think it
>>> matches what you suggested? Naturally there's a precedent patch that
>> introduces
>>> vfio_is_mdev().
>>>
>>
>> Sorry ignore the previous snip, it was the wrong version, see below instead.
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> index c2f158e60386..987dd9779f94 100644
>> --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c
>> @@ -631,6 +631,10 @@ static bool
>> hiod_iommufd_vfio_realize(HostIOMMUDevice
>> *hiod, void *opaque,
>>
>>     hiod->agent = opaque;
>>
>> +    if (vfio_is_mdev(vdev)) {
>> +        return true;
>> +    }
>> +
> 
> Not necessary to create a dummy object.
> What about bypassing object_new(ops->hiod_typename) in vfio_attach_device()?
> 
Not sure I am parsing this. What dummy object you refer to here if it's not
vbasedev::hiod that remains unused? Also in a suggestion by Cedric, and
pre-seeding vbasedev::hiod during attach_device()[0]. So I will sort of do that
already, but your comments means we are allocating a dummy object anyways too?

Or are you perhaps suggesting something like:

@@ -1552,17 +1552,20 @@ bool vfio_attach_device(char *name, VFIODevice *vbasedev,

     assert(ops);

     if (!ops->attach_device(name, vbasedev, as, errp)) {
         return false;
     }

     if (!vfio_mdev(vbasedev) &&
	 !HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod)->realize(hiod, vbasedev, errp)) {

?


[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/4e85db04-fbaa-4a6b-b133-59170c471e24@oracle.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-10  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-08 14:34 [PATCH v3 00/10] hw/vfio: IOMMUFD Dirty Tracking Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] vfio/iommufd: Don't fail to realize on IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO failure Joao Martins
2024-07-09  3:43   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-09  8:56     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 11:45       ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 11:50         ` Joao Martins
2024-07-10  2:53           ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10  9:29             ` Joao Martins [this message]
2024-07-10  9:54               ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10  9:56                 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] backends/iommufd: Extend iommufd_backend_get_device_info() to fetch HW capabilities Joao Martins
2024-07-09  6:13   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] vfio/iommufd: Return errno in iommufd_cdev_attach_ioas_hwpt() Joao Martins
2024-07-08 15:28   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-08 15:32     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 16:28       ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09  6:20       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  8:56         ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] vfio/iommufd: Introduce auto domain creation Joao Martins
2024-07-09  6:26   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-09  9:00     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09  6:50   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  9:09     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] vfio/iommufd: Probe and request hwpt dirty tracking capability Joao Martins
2024-07-09  6:28   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  9:04     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 12:47       ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 16:53         ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] vfio/iommufd: Implement VFIOIOMMUClass::set_dirty_tracking support Joao Martins
2024-07-09  7:07   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  9:13     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] vfio/iommufd: Implement VFIOIOMMUClass::query_dirty_bitmap support Joao Martins
2024-07-09  7:05   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  9:13     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-09 12:41       ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] vfio/iommufd: Parse hw_caps and store dirty tracking support Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] vfio/migration: Don't block migration device dirty tracking is unsupported Joao Martins
2024-07-09  7:02   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-09  9:09     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-10 10:38   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 10:59     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-08 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio/common: Allow disabling device dirty page tracking Joao Martins
2024-07-10 10:42   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-10 10:51     ` Joao Martins
2024-07-11  7:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] hw/vfio: IOMMUFD Dirty Tracking Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-11  8:33   ` Joao Martins
2024-07-11 10:22     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-11 10:44       ` Joao Martins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=97858274-3e67-4908-8119-a1ef9b6a092f@oracle.com \
    --to=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).