Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 1/5] seccomp: adding new syscalls (bugzilla 855162)

[Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>]

On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >>>> Hello folks,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
> >>>> this into the 1.3 release.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks again :)
> >>> 
> >>> I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit
> >>> yesterday afternoon and unfortunately it still doesn't work for me
> >>> (using the same test/reproducer I documented in the RH BZ).  I've tried
> >>> running QEMU both via libvirt and the command line (using a libvirt
> >>> derived command line).
> >>> 
> >>> I'm applying the patches to the F17 QEMU 1.2 package; there is some
> >>> minor fixup needed in the configure script but nothing major.
> >>> 
> >>> What is further frustrating is that the debug code (patch 5/5) doesn't
> >>> seem to output the problematic syscall.  I wanted to investigate this a
> >>> bit more before responding, but with the holiday approaching
> >>> (Thanksgiving in the US), I'm not sure how much progress I'll be able to
> >>> make for the remainder of this week.  Sorry about that.
> >>> 
> >>> If you have any further questions about how, or what, I'm testing, just
> >>> ask.
> >> 
> >> Paul, Is your host 32 or 64-bit?
> > 
> > 64-bit
> 
> I'm having trouble recreating this.  I'm running a Fedora 17 64-bit host
> and a Fedora 17 64-bit guest with domain XML that mirrors yours.
> 
> Here's the domain XML I'm using and the resulting QEMU command line:
> 
> Domain XML:   http://pastebin.com/DWa4RQ1Y
> Command line: http://pastebin.com/2QTWsUhP
> 
> I'm running with QEMU commit 8db972cfa469b4e4afd9c65e54e796b83b5ce3a2
> which is 1.2.0 with: (a) just the first patch applied, as well as with
> (b) all of this patch series applied.
> 
> Any thoughts on what could be different?

Like I said earlier, I'm running with the F17 QEMU 1.2 package, 
qemu-1.2.0-16.fc18 to be exact, with Eduardo's patches applied on top.

I'm currently testing another set of interim patches from Eduardo that was 
sent off-list for testing (you were CC'd); hopefully that will resolve the 
problem.

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat