From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" SMP configurations
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:12:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <995e17f7-4965-4e7e-b039-a2b646b5397f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308160148.3130837-3-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
On 08/03/2024 17.01, Zhao Liu wrote:
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
>
> Currently, it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
> topology parameter as "1". For example, x86 PC machine doesn't
> support drawer/book/cluster topology levels, but user could specify
> "-smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1".
>
> This is meaningless and confusing, so that the support for this kind of
> configurations is marked deprecated since 9.0. And report warning
> message for such case like:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be specified as 1
> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> Unsupported books parameter mustn't be specified as 1
> qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be specified as 1
>
> Users have to ensure that all the topology members described with -smp
> are supported by the target machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 14 +++++++++
> hw/core/machine-smp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 16:01 [PATCH v2 00/13] Cleanup on SMP and its test Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Remove deprecated "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:12 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Calculate total CPUs once in machine_parse_smp_config() Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Drop the unsupported "dies=1" case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Cleanup on SMP and its test Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-09 0:46 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-10 13:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-12 6:46 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-12 6:43 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=995e17f7-4965-4e7e-b039-a2b646b5397f@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).