From: "Zhang, Chen" <chen.zhang@intel.com>
To: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>, Derek Su <dereksu@qnap.com>
Cc: "lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"chyang@qnap.com" <chyang@qnap.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"ctcheng@qnap.com" <ctcheng@qnap.com>,
"jwsu1986@gmail.com" <jwsu1986@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] colo-compare: Fix memory leak in packet_enqueue()
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 03:11:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99afa827c86c43a6b6049d58ca2ab155@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200426132523.51992c28@luklap>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 7:25 PM
> To: Derek Su <dereksu@qnap.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com; chyang@qnap.com;
> jasowang@redhat.com; ctcheng@qnap.com; Zhang, Chen
> <chen.zhang@intel.com>; jwsu1986@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] colo-compare: Fix memory leak in
> packet_enqueue()
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:00:56 +0800
> Derek Su <dereksu@qnap.com> wrote:
>
> > The patch is to fix the "pkt" memory leak in packet_enqueue().
> > The allocated "pkt" needs to be freed if the colo compare primary or
> > secondary queue is too big.
> >
> > Replace the error_report of full queue with a trace event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Derek Su <dereksu@qnap.com>
>
> Looks good now and works well in my tests.
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
> Tested-by: Lukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
>
I will queue this patch to COLO branch, then submit to Jason.
Thanks
Zhang Chen
> Regards,
> Lukas Straub
>
> > ---
> > net/colo-compare.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> > net/trace-events | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index
> > 10c0239f9d..035e11d4d3 100644
> > --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> > +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> > @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ enum {
> > SECONDARY_IN,
> > };
> >
> > +static const char *colo_mode[] = {
> > + [PRIMARY_IN] = "primary",
> > + [SECONDARY_IN] = "secondary",
> > +};
> >
> > static int compare_chr_send(CompareState *s,
> > const uint8_t *buf, @@ -217,6 +221,7 @@
> > static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode, Connection **con)
> > ConnectionKey key;
> > Packet *pkt = NULL;
> > Connection *conn;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > if (mode == PRIMARY_IN) {
> > pkt = packet_new(s->pri_rs.buf, @@ -245,16 +250,18 @@ static
> > int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode, Connection **con)
> > }
> >
> > if (mode == PRIMARY_IN) {
> > - if (!colo_insert_packet(&conn->primary_list, pkt, &conn->pack)) {
> > - error_report("colo compare primary queue size too big,"
> > - "drop packet");
> > - }
> > + ret = colo_insert_packet(&conn->primary_list, pkt,
> > + &conn->pack);
> > } else {
> > - if (!colo_insert_packet(&conn->secondary_list, pkt, &conn->sack)) {
> > - error_report("colo compare secondary queue size too big,"
> > - "drop packet");
> > - }
> > + ret = colo_insert_packet(&conn->secondary_list, pkt,
> > + &conn->sack);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + trace_colo_compare_drop_packet(colo_mode[mode],
> > + "queue size too big, drop packet");
> > + packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> > + pkt = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > *con = conn;
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/net/trace-events b/net/trace-events index
> > 02c13fd0ba..fa49c71533 100644
> > --- a/net/trace-events
> > +++ b/net/trace-events
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ colo_proxy_main(const char *chr) ": %s"
> >
> > # colo-compare.c
> > colo_compare_main(const char *chr) ": %s"
> > +colo_compare_drop_packet(const char *queue, const char *chr)
> ": %s: %s"
> > colo_compare_udp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
> > colo_compare_icmp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
> > colo_compare_ip_info(int psize, const char *sta, const char *stb, int ssize,
> const char *stc, const char *std) "ppkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s,
> spkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-10 2:00 [PATCH v5 0/1] COLO: handling of the full primary or secondary queue Derek Su
2020-04-10 2:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] colo-compare: Fix memory leak in packet_enqueue() Derek Su
2020-04-11 3:51 ` Zhang, Chen
2020-04-26 11:25 ` Lukas Straub
2020-04-27 3:11 ` Zhang, Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99afa827c86c43a6b6049d58ca2ab155@intel.com \
--to=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=chyang@qnap.com \
--cc=ctcheng@qnap.com \
--cc=dereksu@qnap.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jwsu1986@gmail.com \
--cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lukasstraub2@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).