From: Programmingkid <programmingkidx@gmail.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"list@suse.de:PowerPC list:PowerPC" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] How to add my implementation of the fmadds instruction to QEMU
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:39:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9E802039-CDBF-4E1A-AC67-2A6B195FABBF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87twcyuye9.fsf@linaro.org>
On Sep 29, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Programmingkid <programmingkidx@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Programmingkid <programmingkidx@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:58:02AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>>> On 27 September 2016 at 09:51, G 3 <programmingkidx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The problem with your reasoning is you assume this instruction has to be
>>>>>>> 100% correctly implemented. That every single "corner-case" has to be
>>>>>>> accounted for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For upstream QEMU we've already made this design decision --
>>>>>> emulation accuracy comes first, and speed is secondary.
>>>>>> That's why we implement this the way we do.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think there is a way you could get both speed and accuracy, but it's
>>>>> a huge project:
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd need to add full float awareness to TCG - so floating point TCG
>>>>> values and floating point operations as tcp micro-ops, defined
>>>>> according to IEEE semantics. Then you'd need to rewrite the TCG
>>>>> frontends in terms of those new ops, at least for target CPUs close
>>>>> enough to IEEE semantics for that to work. And you'd need to rewrite
>>>>> the TCG backends to implement those fp ops in terms of host cpu fp
>>>>> instructions .. at least when the host has fp behaviour close enough
>>>>> to IEEE to make that work, with a fallback to soft float when that's
>>>>> not the case.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting idea. Do you think we would see a large enough increase in speed
>>>> to justify this project?
>>>
>>> It really depends on workload. If you want to run lots of encoding/audio
>>> workloads in TCG guests it is certainly something that could be
>>> improved.
>>>
>>> As others have pointed out however it is a fairly big project.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Bennée
>>
>> Alex Bennée? I was just watching your KVM video about MTTCG! Small world.
>>
>> I so want audio to play correctly in a PowerPC Mac OS guest. So this
>> project might be necessary.
>>
>> If it is a fairly big project, then I will need to map it out some more.
>> I've made a mind map of what I know so far. It is attached to this email.
>> Let me know if you can think of anything to add.
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/MYkiKGx.png
>
> While I appreciate your target is PPC I think if you are going to
> suggest any core floating point TCGOps you will need to survey the
> behaviour of the FPUs on all (or at least the most common) TCG targets
> and go for instructions that behave the same across a broad range of
> targets.
>
> I think if we were to introduce this into the code base we would need to
> have a decent range of test cases. I'm talking about making sure we
> exercise the whole range of behaviour:
>
> - min/max rounding behaviour
> - handling of denormalisation
> - signalling and non-signalling NaN behaviour
> - exception generation
>
> Testing is going to be very important for confidence.
Thank you very much for this list. I will see what I can come up with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-29 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 1:05 [Qemu-devel] How to add my implementation of the fmadds instruction to QEMU G 3
2016-09-27 3:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " David Gibson
2016-09-27 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2016-09-27 14:33 ` G 3
2016-09-27 15:21 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-27 16:16 ` Eric Blake
2016-09-27 16:51 ` G 3
2016-09-27 16:58 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-29 4:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " David Gibson
2016-09-29 15:20 ` Programmingkid
2016-09-29 18:19 ` Alex Bennée
2016-09-29 21:52 ` Programmingkid
2016-09-29 22:36 ` Alex Bennée
2016-09-29 22:39 ` Programmingkid [this message]
2016-09-29 15:41 ` Peter Maydell
2016-09-29 16:55 ` Programmingkid
2016-09-30 0:39 ` David Gibson
2016-09-30 0:44 ` Programmingkid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9E802039-CDBF-4E1A-AC67-2A6B195FABBF@gmail.com \
--to=programmingkidx@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).