From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVcI9-0004tO-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:38:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVcI7-0004tC-Dv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:38:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVcI7-0004t7-8k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:38:27 -0500 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.238]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HVcFv-0001yM-Lu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:36:11 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so2914431wxd for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9a158e2e0703251636p2209eed0u5e1b8f736343a8e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:36:10 -0700 From: "Kyle Hubert" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] QEMU + -std-vga + XFree86 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I'm working with QEMU on an XFree86 machine. I was desirous of having 1600x1200 working in the virtual machine, so I looked at using the -std-vga option with the "vesa" X driver. While initializing X, I get the following: (II) VESA(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000 (II) VESA(0): VESA BIOS detected (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Version 0.0 (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 0 kB (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM: ^A The log continues on to say: (II) VESA(0): Total Memory: 0 64KB banks (0kB) (II) VESA(0): Generic Monitor: Using hsync range of 28.00-51.00 kHz (II) VESA(0): Generic Monitor: Using vrefresh range of 43.00-60.00 Hz (II) VESA(0): Not using mode "1600x1200" (no mode of this name) (II) VESA(0): Not using mode "1280x1024" (no mode of this name) (II) VESA(0): Not using mode "1024x768" (no mode of this name) (II) VESA(0): Not using mode "800x600" (no mode of this name) (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "640x480" (insufficient memory given virtual size) I'm not positive this is my problem, but it looks like it isn't reporting the vram size correctly, does this sound correct? Thanks for the time. -Kyle