qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:02:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a39a948-91a1-7cfe-f2a5-d30e5564f318@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ab2e59-10c0-c7df-c014-b54883ddccd3@linux.ibm.com>

On 11.05.20 16:50, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 5/11/20 4:44 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 11.05.20 16:36, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> On 5/9/20 1:08 AM, Collin Walling wrote:
>>>> The SCCB must be checked for a sufficient length before it is filled
>>>> with any data. If the length is insufficient, then the SCLP command
>>>> is suppressed and the proper response code is set in the SCCB header.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Fixes tag?
>>> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> This is not a fix AFAIKs.
>> sclp_service_call()/sclp_service_call_protected() always supplies a full
>> SCCB of exactly 4k size.
>>
> 
> We don't check for QEMU's 4k buffer here, but for the length that was
> specified by the guest.
> 
> It's valid for the guest to request cpu info and state that its buffer
> is only 1k. We can't write everything in 1k if we have ~200 cpus, so
> we'll report the insufficient length rc.
> 
> What he fixes here is the time of the length check, it should be done
> before any changes are being done to the work_sccb.

I don't have access to the spec, especially, if the guest can expect
nothing else in the sccb to change in case we report an error code. So
whatever you tell me, I have to trust you :)


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-11 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08 23:08 [PATCH v1 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] s390/sclp: remove SCLPDevice param from prepare_cpu_entries Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:37   ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-12  7:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:36   ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-11 14:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-11 14:47       ` Collin Walling
2020-05-11 14:50       ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-11 15:02         ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-05-12 16:01           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:16             ` Collin Walling
2020-05-12 16:24               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:25                 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-13  7:43             ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-13  8:16               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-14 17:22                 ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 11:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks Collin Walling
2020-05-12  7:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 14:55     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-13  7:00       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-14 17:23         ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on sccb length Collin Walling
2020-05-12  7:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 14:46     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-05-13  7:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-13 22:44     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-08 23:08 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] s390: diagnose 318 info reset and migration support Collin Walling
2020-05-09  8:07 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 no-reply
2020-05-12 16:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-12 16:20   ` Collin Walling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a39a948-91a1-7cfe-f2a5-d30e5564f318@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).