From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
groug@kaod.org
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
aik@ozlabs.ru, farosas@linux.ibm.com,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
paulus@samba.org, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/17] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a6de71d-eb48-d638-2f33-04d7143b1284@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200303034351.333043-11-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On 3/3/20 4:43 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> When the LPCR is written, we update the env->rmls field with the RMA limit
> it implies. Simplify things by just calculating the value directly from
> the LPCR value when we need it.
>
> It's possible this is a little slower, but it's unlikely to be significant,
> since this is only for real mode accesses in a translation configuration
> that's not used very often, and the whole thing is behind the qemu TLB
> anyway. Therefore, keeping the number of state variables down and not
> having to worry about making sure it's always in sync seems the better
> option.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> target/ppc/cpu.h | 1 -
> target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 9 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index 8077fdb068..f9871b1233 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,6 @@ struct CPUPPCState {
> uint64_t insns_flags2;
> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> ppc_slb_t vrma_slb;
> - target_ulong rmls;
> #endif
>
> int error_code;
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index fcccaabb88..4fd7b7ee74 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -837,8 +837,10 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>
> goto skip_slb_search;
> } else {
> + target_ulong limit = rmls_limit(cpu);
> +
> /* Emulated old-style RMO mode, bounds check against RMLS */
> - if (raddr >= env->rmls) {
> + if (raddr >= limit) {
> if (rwx == 2) {
> ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, SRR1_PROTFAULT);
> } else {
> @@ -1000,8 +1002,10 @@ hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong addr)
> return -1;
> }
> } else {
> + target_ulong limit = rmls_limit(cpu);
> +
> /* Emulated old-style RMO mode, bounds check against RMLS */
> - if (raddr >= env->rmls) {
> + if (raddr >= limit) {
> return -1;
> }
> return raddr | env->spr[SPR_RMOR];
> @@ -1091,7 +1095,6 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>
> env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = val & pcc->lpcr_mask;
> - env->rmls = rmls_limit(cpu);
> ppc_hash64_update_vrma(cpu);
> }
>
>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 3:43 [PATCH v7 00/17] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] ppc: Remove stub support for 32-bit hypervisor mode David Gibson
2020-03-05 8:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-03-05 8:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-03-05 8:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-10 10:06 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-03-11 3:15 ` David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS] David Gibson
2020-03-03 7:52 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 8:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-03-03 8:57 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 8:48 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently David Gibson
2020-03-03 9:37 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 9:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-05 9:47 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 10:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] spapr: Don't use weird units for MIN_RMA_SLOF David Gibson
2020-03-05 8:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] spapr,ppc: Simplify signature of kvmppc_rma_size() David Gibson
2020-03-05 8:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] spapr: Don't attempt to clamp RMA to VRMA constraint David Gibson
2020-03-03 9:55 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] spapr: Don't clamp RMA to 16GiB on new machine types David Gibson
2020-03-03 10:02 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 8:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] spapr: Clean up RMA size calculation David Gibson
2020-03-03 10:18 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-05 8:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-03 3:43 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] spapr: Fold spapr_node0_size() into its only caller David Gibson
2020-03-03 10:32 ` Greg Kurz
2020-03-04 1:25 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a6de71d-eb48-d638-2f33-04d7143b1284@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).