From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyrpD-0005pA-Cq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:00:59 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FyrpB-0005oy-Up
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:00:59 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyrpB-0005ov-PU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:00:57 -0400
Received: from [64.233.162.195] (helo=nz-out-0102.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fyrpc-0008OY-LZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:01:24 -0400
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 4so1891168nzn
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9b0d5f320607070800y31e7e0a7g18209e1915bc80a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:00:56 -0400
From: WaxDragon <waxdragon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Trapping ctrl-c
In-Reply-To: <1152282407.5543.13.camel@gartonm-desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1152282407.5543.13.camel@gartonm-desktop>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

It's a nice idea, but awfully *nix specific. ;0)

On 7/7/06, Martin Garton <martin@stupids.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that ACPI is supported, does anyone agree that it would make sense
> to trap SIGINT (any perhaps SIGTERM) and use it to generate an acpi
> power button event?  That way, operating systems that support it could
> shut down cleanly.
>
> This would be particularly useful when you have multiple qemu instances
> running with the vnc option and would mean the user does not have to use
> vnc multiple times to shut down but instead could just do "killall qemu"
>
> --
> Martin.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>


-- 
<GedMurphy> why does the size matter?