From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GQ1AO-0007mV-2C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:27:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GQ1AM-0007jd-Dy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:27:03 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQ1AM-0007jM-6X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:27:02 -0400
Received: from [66.249.82.238] (helo=wx-out-0506.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GQ1De-0002Ik-18
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:30:26 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so279169wxc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9b0d5f320609200527x5df481bfgee697e85156b233c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:27:01 -0400
From: WaxDragon <waxdragon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc uses all host cpu while target
	system is idle
In-Reply-To: <45110AAA.7080508@aurel32.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45110AAA.7080508@aurel32.net>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

I've seen this same behaviour with 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels.

On 9/20/06, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have successully installed a Debian Etch for Sparc under qemu (CVS
> version), and successfully updated it to unstable. Everything seems to
> work correctly, the performances are ok, but I have remarked than
> qemu-system-sparc is using all the CPU on the host system, while the
> sparc target system is idle. Maybe the problem is in the sparc kernel? I
> am using the one from unstable, ie a 2.6.17 kernel.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks,
> Aurelien
>
> --
>    .''`.  Aurelien Jarno                    | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
>   : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
>   `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
>     `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>


-- 
22:38 <@WaxDragon> false ^ true
22:39 < false> :(
22:39 < false> dont you think you can XOR me and get away with it! I
always return!