qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, akihiko.odaki@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/vm: do not specify -bios option
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:14:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bfd73ef-749b-e9d7-9202-5ba4221c0f72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqrtiL18Z2jWCHM3@redhat.com>

On 6/16/22 10:44, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:30:25AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> When running from the build tree, the executable is able to find
>> the BIOS on its own; when running from the source tree, a firmware
>> blob should already be installed and there is no guarantee that
>> the one in the source tree works with the QEMU that is being used for
>> the installation.
> I think there is interaction with
> 
>    --firmwarepath=/usr/share/qemu-firmware:/usr/share/ipxe/qemu:/usr/share/seavgabios:/usr/share/seabios:/usr/share/sgabios
> 
> as the firmware path listed there will be searched before the local
> build tree.
> 
> I agree with your desire to remove the -bios option, but I'm not
> sure it is entirely safe unless logic in qemu_find_file is fixed
> to ignore the global search path when running from the build
> tree.

Isn't this the same for any other invocation of QEMU, for example in qtest?

I admit I didn't think of the interaction with --firmwarepath, but "if 
it hurts, don't do it" might apply here.  That is, install compatible 
firmware to the path _before_ trying to use a QEMU that specifies that path.

Thanks,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-16  8:30 [PATCH] tests/vm: do not specify -bios option Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-16  8:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-06-16 10:14   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-06-16 10:29     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-06-16 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-06-17  8:51 ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9bfd73ef-749b-e9d7-9202-5ba4221c0f72@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=akihiko.odaki@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).