qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
	eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/12] s390x: CPU Topology
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 22:05:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c554788-aa51-d0fb-193b-f01ad266b256@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ad0e006-72ee-3e24-48ed-fc8dd49db130@linux.ibm.com>



On 7/14/22 20:43, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On 6/20/22 16:03, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This new spin is essentially for coherence with the last Linux CPU
>> Topology patch, function testing and coding style modifications.
>>
>> Forword
>> =======
>>
>> The goal of this series is to implement CPU topology for S390, it
>> improves the preceeding series with the implementation of books and
>> drawers, of non uniform CPU topology and with documentation.
>>
>> To use these patches, you will need the Linux series version 10.
>> You find it there:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/20/590
>>
>> Currently this code is for KVM only, I have no idea if it is interesting
>> to provide a TCG patch. If ever it will be done in another series.
>>
>> To have a better understanding of the S390x CPU Topology and its
>> implementation in QEMU you can have a look at the documentation in the
>> last patch or follow the introduction here under.
>>
>> A short introduction
>> ====================
>>
>> CPU Topology is described in the S390 POP with essentially the description
>> of two instructions:
>>
>> PTF Perform Topology function used to poll for topology change
>>      and used to set the polarization but this part is not part of this item.
>>
>> STSI Store System Information and the SYSIB 15.1.x providing the Topology
>>      configuration.
>>
>> S390 Topology is a 6 levels hierarchical topology with up to 5 level
>>      of containers. The last topology level, specifying the CPU cores.
>>
>>      This patch series only uses the two lower levels sockets and cores.
>>      
>>      To get the information on the topology, S390 provides the STSI
>>      instruction, which stores a structures providing the list of the
>>      containers used in the Machine topology: the SYSIB.
>>      A selector within the STSI instruction allow to chose how many topology
>>      levels will be provide in the SYSIB.
>>
>>      Using the Topology List Entries (TLE) provided inside the SYSIB we
>>      the Linux kernel is able to compute the information about the cache
>>      distance between two cores and can use this information to take
>>      scheduling decisions.
> 
> Do the socket, book, ... metaphors and looking at STSI from the existing
> smp infrastructure even make sense?

Sorry, I do not understand.
I admit the cover-letter is old and I did not rewrite it really good 
since the first patch series.

What we do is:
Compute the STSI from the SMP + numa + device QEMU parameters .

> 
> STSI 15.1.x reports the topology to the guest and for a virtual machine,
> this topology can be very dynamic. So a CPU can move from from one topology
> container to another, but the socket of a cpu changing while it's running seems
> a bit strange. And this isn't supported by this patch series as far as I understand,
> the only topology changes are on hotplug.

A CPU changing from a socket to another socket is the only case the PTF 
instruction reports a change in the topology with the case a new CPU is 
plug in.
It is not expected to appear often but it does appear.
The code has been removed from the kernel in spin 10 for 2 reasons:
1) we decided to first support only dedicated and pinned CPU
2) Christian fears it may happen too often due to Linux host scheduling 
and could be a performance problem

So yes now we only have a topology report on vCPU plug.







> 

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-20 14:03 [PATCH v8 00/12] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] Update Linux Headers Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] s390x/cpu_topology: CPU topology objects and structures Pierre Morel
2022-06-27 13:31   ` Janosch Frank
2022-06-28 11:08     ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-29 15:25     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-04 11:47       ` Janosch Frank
2022-07-04 14:51         ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-12 15:40   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-13 14:59     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-14 10:38       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-14 11:25         ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-14 12:50           ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-14 19:26             ` Pierre Morel
2022-08-23 13:30   ` Thomas Huth
2022-08-23 16:30     ` Pierre Morel
2022-08-23 17:41     ` Pierre Morel
2022-08-24  7:30       ` Thomas Huth
2022-08-24  8:41         ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] s390x/cpu_topology: implementating Store Topology System Information Pierre Morel
2022-06-27 14:26   ` Janosch Frank
2022-06-28 11:03     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-20 19:34   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-21 11:23     ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] s390x/cpu_topology: Adding books to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] s390x/cpu_topology: Adding books to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] s390x/cpu_topology: Adding drawers to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] s390x/cpu_topology: Adding drawers to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] s390x/cpu_topology: implementing numa for the s390x topology Pierre Morel
2022-07-14 14:57   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-14 20:17     ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-15  9:11       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-15 13:07         ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-20 17:24           ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-21  7:58             ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-21  8:16               ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-21 11:41                 ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-22 12:08                   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-08-23 16:25                     ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] target/s390x: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] s390x/cpu_topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] s390x/cpu_topology: CPU topology migration Pierre Morel
2022-06-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] s390x/cpu_topology: activating CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-07-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] s390x: CPU Topology Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-14 20:05   ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-07-15  9:31     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-15 13:47       ` Pierre Morel
2022-07-15 18:28         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-07-18 12:32           ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c554788-aa51-d0fb-193b-f01ad266b256@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).