From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x: create a compat s390 phb for <=2.10
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:34:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c8c2596-c4cf-41ad-7228-0ed598cf65cd@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170927170346.68ca0cd8.cohuck@redhat.com>
On 09/27/2017 05:03 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:49:27 +0100
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> * Cornelia Huck (cohuck@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:28:38 +0100
>>> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> * David Hildenbrand (david@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>>> On 27.09.2017 12:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/27/2017 12:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:25:00 +0800
>>>>>>> Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 在 2017/9/27 下午5:47, Cornelia Huck 写道:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:40:25 +0200
>>>>>>>>> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd really really really (did I mention really?) favor something like a
>>>>>>>>>> dummy device, because we could easily handle the !CONFIG_PCI case then.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All these compat options and conditions will kill us someday... we're
>>>>>>>>>> already patching around that whole stuff way too much.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If we ever unconditionally created a device, we should keep doing so.
>>>>>>>>> Yes, that whole thing is horrible, especially interaction with compat
>>>>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have an idea on how to create such a dummy device (without
>>>>>>>>> having to effectively copy a lot of configured-out code)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about in s390_pcihost_hot_plug() we check s390_has_feat(zpci)?
>>>>>>>> If no zpci feature, we avoid plugging any pci device.
>>>>>>>> Then we could always create phb.
>>>>>>>> I think pcibus's vmstate is only data to migrate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's still problematic if CONFIG_PCI is off. I currently don't have a
>>>>>>> better idea than either disallowing compat machines on builds without
>>>>>>> pci, or using a dummy device...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For this particular case your initial patch might be less problematic than
>>>>>> a dummy device, because the code that does the migration is NOT contained
>>>>>> in s390 specific code but in common PCI code instead. We would need to keep
>>>>>> the dummy device always in a way that it will work with the common PCI
>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting, so how is migration then handled for e.g. x86 or other
>>>>> architectures that can work without CONFIG_PCI? I assume their migration
>>>>> should also break?
>>>>
>>>> It's tied to machine-type; the x86 i440fx and q35 machine types have
>>>> PCI; you can't disable PCI while still having those machine types.
>>>> (I don't know if you can disable PCI at all on x86)
>>>
>>> Ugh, that sounds like we need two machine types on s390x as well
>>> (s390x-ccw-virtio and s390x-ccw-virtio-nopci or so), built
>>> conditionally. That whole zpci detanglement is looking worse and
>>> worse :(
>>
>> Well fundamentally the migration expects to migrate something into
>> the same shaped hole on the destination; if you've got a lump of PCI
>> config on the source there's got to be somewhere for it to fit on the
>> destination.
>> Now, if PCI is actually pretty rare; then you might be able to make
>> the host-pci bridge a normal device and not include it in any
>> machine type; that way those who want PCI can just instantiate
>> the host-pci bridge, and those who don't want it just stick with
>> the base machine type.
>
> I fear that ship has already sailed; the s390-ccw-virtio machine type
> has been instantiating a phb for quite some time, which means we have
> to drag this on in the compat machines...
In the end that means that you should revert
commit d32bd032d8fde41281aae34c16a4aa97e9acfeac
Author: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Jul 6 17:21:52 2017 +0200
Commit: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Wed Aug 30 18:23:25 2017 +0200
s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally
to keep s390-ccw-virtio clean proper.
If you want to have PCI disabled, you can do you in a machine like
s390-rhelx.y.z or whatever.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-28 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-26 16:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390x: more zpci compat fun Cornelia Huck
2017-09-26 16:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x: create a compat s390 phb for <=2.10 Cornelia Huck
2017-09-26 17:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-26 18:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 9:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 10:25 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-09-27 10:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 10:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-27 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-27 12:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-27 14:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-09-27 14:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-27 14:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-09-27 15:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 10:34 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2017-09-28 10:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-28 12:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 12:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-28 12:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-28 12:33 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c8c2596-c4cf-41ad-7228-0ed598cf65cd@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).