From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com,
eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:22:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d4e8f39-ba07-dc19-58a0-076ac9b186e0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c268bd5b3246bdd0b7736eeeaba200a10546c470.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 5/22/23 21:47, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 18:14 +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> This test takes care to check the changes on different entitlements
>> when the guest requests a polarization change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tests/avocado/s390_topology.py | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> index 30d3c0d0cb..64e1cc9209 100644
>> --- a/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> +++ b/tests/avocado/s390_topology.py
>> @@ -244,3 +244,59 @@ def test_polarisation(self):
>> '/bin/cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/dispatching', '0')
>>
>> self.check_topology(0, 0, 0, 0, 'medium', False)
>> +
>> + def test_entitlement(self):
>> + """
>> + This test verifies that QEMU modifies the polarization
>> + after a guest request.
>> +
>> + :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
>> + :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
>> + """
>> + self.kernel_init()
>> + self.vm.add_args('-smp',
>> + '1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=3,cores=2,maxcpus=24')
>> + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=1')
>> + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=2')
>> + self.vm.add_args('-device', 'z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=3')
> Why the -device statements? Won't they result in the same as specifying -smp 4,...?
> Same for patch 17.
A left over.
You are right it is the same.
thanks,
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 16:14 [PATCH v20 00/21] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 01/21] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 8:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:27 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:36 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:54 ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 11:17 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:05 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-02 13:48 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03 7:23 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 02/21] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 13:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:35 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 9:12 ` Thomas Huth
2023-05-03 10:23 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 13:48 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 12:30 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-05-03 7:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 11:23 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 03/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-04-27 17:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-28 12:42 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-02 17:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-03 8:43 ` Pierre Morel
2023-05-03 13:01 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 04/21] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 05/21] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 06/21] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-05-04 11:03 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-05 9:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 07/21] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 08/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:42 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 8:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 09/21] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-06-12 7:55 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-06-21 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 10/21] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 19:49 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 11/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-05-08 21:47 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-09 12:31 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 12/21] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-05-10 12:04 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-05-12 11:56 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 13/21] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 14/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:38 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 11:58 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 15/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:45 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:01 ` Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 16/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-05-22 19:47 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-27 13:22 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 17/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 18/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 19/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 20/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-04-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v20 21/21] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology query-cpu-polarization Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d4e8f39-ba07-dc19-58a0-076ac9b186e0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).