From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5V8i-0003gq-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:06:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5V8f-00010D-Aq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:06:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e5V8f-0000zj-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:06:53 -0400 References: <1508495342.18146.8.camel@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <9e4910ab-c841-a814-8cc1-879ddb924b7c@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:06:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1508495342.18146.8.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SDL2 issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel qemu-devel On 20.10.2017 12:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 13:05 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Hello >> >> After we tried to switch from SDL1 to SDL2 in Debian qemu, >> we receives quite some reports about various issues. >> >> We use 2.10.1 version of qemu. >> >> Example of the issues: http://bugs.debian.org/879193 > > Doesn't reproduce. > >> http://bugs.debian.org/870025 - a few patches at the bottom > > Those patches should go to the mailing list. > >> http://bugs.debian.org/878087 > > Yes, -k is simply not supported with sdl2. > Those remappings should be done in the guest instead. > >> What's the status of SDL2 support in qemu? I've seen it is >> the default now if SDL2 is present on the system (it was >> SDL1 before). > > Yep. Long term I want drop SDL1, this is the first step. > >> Also, what's the status of SDL _audio_ support, is it needed >> at all once we have alsa, pa and oss? > > Dunno how well mixing sdl display with non-sdl audio works. Feel free > to send a patch dropping sdl audio to the list to check what people > think about that ;) I think we've had that topic before: SDL audio is still required for some non-Linux systems like Haiku, so please don't remove it, even if SDL audio still needs some love with SDL2 to get really usable there again. Thomas