qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] s390x: chsc nt2 events are pci-only
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:57:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e70ce06-7d67-e808-cbb9-5877bf852ac7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718142455.32676-4-cohuck@redhat.com>

On 18.07.2017 16:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> The nt2 event class is pci-only - don't look for events if pci is
> not in the active cpu model.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c  |  4 ++--
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h  |  4 ++--
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c |  4 ++--
>  target/s390x/ioinst.c    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index 61cfd2138f..c57f6ebae0 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void)
>      return phb;
>  }
>  
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
>  {
>      ChscSeiNt2Res *nt2_res = (ChscSeiNt2Res *)res;
>      PciCcdfAvail *accdf;
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
>      return rc;
>  }
>  
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
>  {
>      S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
>  
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> index 67af2c12ff..5df6292509 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> @@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ typedef struct S390pciState {
>  } S390pciState;
>  
>  S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void);
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res);
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void);
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res);
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void);
>  void s390_pci_sclp_configure(SCCB *sccb);
>  void s390_pci_sclp_deconfigure(SCCB *sccb);
>  void s390_pci_iommu_enable(S390PCIIOMMU *iommu);
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> index 2e7e42a2af..cc7278a865 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
>  #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>  
>  /* target/s390x/ioinst.c */
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
>  {
>      return 1;
>  }
>  
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
>  {
>      return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> index d5e6b8066b..a9e5b13292 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,22 @@ static int chsc_sei_nt0_have_event(void)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +{
> +    if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
> +        return pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(res);
> +    }
> +    return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +{
> +    if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
> +        return pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event();
> +    }
> +    return 0;
> +}

Hmm, since you're having wrapper functions for these now anyway, I
wonder whether it would be more elegant to make
pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event() and pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event() function
pointers in the S390pciState object instead. Then you could do something
like:

static int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
{
    S390pciState *ps = s390_get_phb();

    if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI) && ps != NULL) {
        return ps->pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event();
    }
    return 0;
}

and you would not need the stubs in pci-stubs.c anymore?

 Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 14:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] s390x: zPCI detangling Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/9] kvm: remove hard dependency on pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 15:00   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 15:20     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/9] s390x/pci: add stubs Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  7:42   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] s390x: chsc nt2 events are pci-only Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  7:57   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-07-19  8:05     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/9] s390x/pci: do not advertise pci on non-pci builds Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 19:56   ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-07-19  8:00     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  8:56       ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19  9:24         ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  9:27           ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19  9:38             ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 11:41   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19 12:18     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 5/9] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  8:00   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 6/9] s390x/sclp: properly guard pci-specific functions Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  8:03   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 7/9] s390x/pci: fence off instructions for non-pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  3:21   ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19  7:38     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  8:07   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19  8:49     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 8/9] s390x/kvm: msi route fixup " Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:58   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-18 15:22     ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  3:16       ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19  7:09         ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19  7:30           ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19  3:13   ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 9/9] s390x: refine pci dependencies Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:51   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] s390x: zPCI detangling no-reply
2017-07-19  7:54   ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 13:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 13:31   ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-24 10:44     ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-08-07 15:46       ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e70ce06-7d67-e808-cbb9-5877bf852ac7@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).