From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] s390x: chsc nt2 events are pci-only
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:57:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e70ce06-7d67-e808-cbb9-5877bf852ac7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718142455.32676-4-cohuck@redhat.com>
On 18.07.2017 16:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> The nt2 event class is pci-only - don't look for events if pci is
> not in the active cpu model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 ++--
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 4 ++--
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c | 4 ++--
> target/s390x/ioinst.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index 61cfd2138f..c57f6ebae0 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void)
> return phb;
> }
>
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> {
> ChscSeiNt2Res *nt2_res = (ChscSeiNt2Res *)res;
> PciCcdfAvail *accdf;
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> {
> S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> index 67af2c12ff..5df6292509 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h
> @@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ typedef struct S390pciState {
> } S390pciState;
>
> S390pciState *s390_get_phb(void);
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res);
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void);
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res);
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void);
> void s390_pci_sclp_configure(SCCB *sccb);
> void s390_pci_sclp_deconfigure(SCCB *sccb);
> void s390_pci_iommu_enable(S390PCIIOMMU *iommu);
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> index 2e7e42a2af..cc7278a865 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-stub.c
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
> #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
>
> /* target/s390x/ioinst.c */
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> -int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +int pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> index d5e6b8066b..a9e5b13292 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> @@ -599,6 +599,22 @@ static int chsc_sei_nt0_have_event(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(void *res)
> +{
> + if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
> + return pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event(res);
> + }
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
> +{
> + if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
> + return pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event();
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Hmm, since you're having wrapper functions for these now anyway, I
wonder whether it would be more elegant to make
pci_chsc_sei_nt2_get_event() and pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event() function
pointers in the S390pciState object instead. Then you could do something
like:
static int chsc_sei_nt2_have_event(void)
{
S390pciState *ps = s390_get_phb();
if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI) && ps != NULL) {
return ps->pci_chsc_sei_nt2_have_event();
}
return 0;
}
and you would not need the stubs in pci-stubs.c anymore?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 14:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] s390x: zPCI detangling Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/9] kvm: remove hard dependency on pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 15:00 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 15:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/9] s390x/pci: add stubs Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 7:42 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] s390x: chsc nt2 events are pci-only Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 7:57 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-07-19 8:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/9] s390x/pci: do not advertise pci on non-pci builds Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 19:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-07-19 8:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 8:56 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 9:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 9:27 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 9:38 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 11:41 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19 12:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 5/9] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 8:00 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 6/9] s390x/sclp: properly guard pci-specific functions Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 8:03 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 7/9] s390x/pci: fence off instructions for non-pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 3:21 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 7:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 8:07 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19 8:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 8/9] s390x/kvm: msi route fixup " Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-18 15:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 3:16 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-19 7:09 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19 7:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 3:13 ` Yi Min Zhao
2017-07-18 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 9/9] s390x: refine pci dependencies Cornelia Huck
2017-07-18 14:51 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-18 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] s390x: zPCI detangling no-reply
2017-07-19 7:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 13:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-19 13:31 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-24 10:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-08-07 15:46 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e70ce06-7d67-e808-cbb9-5877bf852ac7@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).