From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Mark Cave-Ayland" <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitlab for upstream qemu repo?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:24:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f6c63c6-599b-ac15-42e2-b9c1991fc7ee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <672b8aa0-2128-23e1-b778-01a4d96b209d@redhat.com>
On 10/22/20 11:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> now that Gitlab is the primary CI infrastructure for QEMU, and that all
> QEMU git repositories (including mirrors) are available on Gitlab, I
> would like to propose that committers use Gitlab when merging commits to
> QEMU repositories.
>
> Nothing would change for developers, who would still have access to all
> three sets of repositories (git.qemu.org, gitlab.com and github.com).
> Committers however would need to have an account on the
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project organization with access to the
> repositories they care about. They would also lose write access to
> /srv/git on qemu.org.
For clarification, I'm assuming the set of committers is rather small,
and not the same as the set of subsystem maintainers who send pull
requests for a committer to then merge in. Does this proposal mean that
pull requests would have to switch to gitlab merge requests, or would
there be a transition period where submaintainers still send pull
requests via whichever means desired (mail or gitlab merge request), but
the eventual committer repackages that as a gitlab merge request before
it is upstream?
>
> Of course this is just starting a discussion, so I'm not even proposing
> a date for the switch.
I'm hoping that as part of the consideration that we make sure that
command line tooling can still drive everything; there is a difference
between requiring a web page to initiate a merge request, vs. proper
command line tooling one to leave the web page as an optional part of
the workflow for only those who want it.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 16:47 [RFC] Using gitlab for upstream qemu repo? Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-22 17:24 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-10-23 7:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-10-23 8:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-10-23 13:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-10-23 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-23 8:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-10-23 13:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-10-26 11:04 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-27 13:14 ` Michael Roth
2020-10-27 18:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-27 14:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-10-27 14:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-10-27 14:32 ` Peter Maydell
2021-01-05 14:12 ` Peter Maydell
2021-01-11 9:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-01-11 11:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f6c63c6-599b-ac15-42e2-b9c1991fc7ee@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).