From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] virtio-pci:decouple the single vector from the interrupt process
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:54:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fc1a974-90bd-73da-94f4-a4fd929116bb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706072030.32365-9-lulu@redhat.com>
在 2021/7/6 下午3:20, Cindy Lu 写道:
> use the kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one and _release_one
> these funtion is to deal with the single vector, the
> whole process will finish in a loop with vq number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index fe06847b62..e43d5760ee 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -666,7 +666,6 @@ static uint32_t virtio_read_config(PCIDevice *pci_dev,
> }
>
> static int kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
> - unsigned int queue_no,
> unsigned int vector)
> {
> VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector];
> @@ -733,87 +732,63 @@ static int virtio_pci_get_notifier(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int queue_no,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs)
> +static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int queue_no)
> {
> - PCIDevice *dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> - VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> - VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> unsigned int vector;
> - int ret, queue_no;
> + int ret;
> EventNotifier *n;
> - for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) {
> - if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, queue_no)) {
> - break;
> - }
So this check is not moved but deleted, is this intentional?
> - ret = virtio_pci_get_notifier(proxy, queue_no, &n, &vector);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - break;
> - }
> - if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev)) {
> - continue;
> - }
So did this?
> - ret = kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(proxy, queue_no, vector);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - goto undo;
> - }
> - /* If guest supports masking, set up irqfd now.
> - * Otherwise, delay until unmasked in the frontend.
> - */
> - if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) {
> - ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, n, vector);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
> - goto undo;
> - }
> - }
> + ret = virtio_pci_get_notifier(proxy, queue_no, &n, &vector);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(proxy, vector);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto undo;
> + }
> + ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, n, vector);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto undo;
> }
> return 0;
> -
> undo:
> - while (--queue_no >= 0) {
> - vector = virtio_queue_vector(vdev, queue_no);
> - if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev)) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) {
> - ret = virtio_pci_get_notifier(proxy, queue_no, &n, &vector);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - break;
> - }
> - kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector);
> - }
> - kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
> + kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs)
> +{
> + int queue_no;
> + int ret = 0;
> + for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) {
> + ret = kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one(proxy, queue_no);
> }
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs)
> +
> +static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release_one(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
> + int queue_no)
> {
> - PCIDevice *dev = &proxy->pci_dev;
> VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
> unsigned int vector;
> - int queue_no;
> - VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> EventNotifier *n;
> - int ret ;
> + int ret;
> + VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
> + ret = virtio_pci_get_notifier(proxy, queue_no, &n, &vector);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) {
> + kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector);
> + }
> + kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
> +}
> +static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs)
> +{
> + int queue_no;
> +
> for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) {
> - if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, queue_no)) {
> - break;
> - }
This is deleted by not removed.
> - ret = virtio_pci_get_notifier(proxy, queue_no, &n, &vector);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - break;
> - }
> - if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev)) {
> - continue;
> - }
So did this.
Thanks
> - /* If guest supports masking, clean up irqfd now.
> - * Otherwise, it was cleaned when masked in the frontend.
> - */
> - if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) {
> - kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector);
> - }
> - kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
> + kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release_one(proxy, queue_no);
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 7:20 [PATCH v8 0/9] vhost-vdpa: add support for configure interrupt Cindy Lu
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] virtio: introduce macro IRTIO_CONFIG_IRQ_IDX Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 4:04 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] virtio-pci:decouple virtqueue from interrupt setting process Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:22 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] vhost: add new call back function for config interrupt Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:23 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] vhost-vdpa: add support for config interrupt call back Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:24 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] vhost-net:add support for configure interrupt Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:41 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] virtio-mmio: add " Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:43 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] virtio-pci: decouple notifier from interrupt process Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:53 ` Jason Wang
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] virtio-pci:decouple the single vector from the " Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 5:54 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-07-06 7:20 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] virtio-pci: add support for configure interrupt Cindy Lu
2021-07-09 6:03 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fc1a974-90bd-73da-94f4-a4fd929116bb@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).