From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54741 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxnjY-0002Zl-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:17:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxnF5-0002VV-Bc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:45:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:50190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxnF5-0002VN-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:45:39 -0400 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so3338036qyk.4 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:45:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Blue Swirl Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:45:18 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/15] Use a few more gcc warning flags List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > If the compiler supports the following warning flags, use them: > > -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers > -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wclobbered > > Currently, these flags don't produce any warnings. I noticed that in fact -Wclobbered produced warnings, so I removed the flag before committing. Perhaps those warnings should be investigated further.