qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't allow multiwrites against a block device without underlying medium
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:12:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik_Fu=asjFSBSEijDFs1yMBexGy200k-7g-oGVt@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302150422.GA13257@us.ibm.com>

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> If the block device has been closed, we no longer have a medium to submit
> IO against, check for this before submitting io.  This prevents a segfault
> further in the code where we dereference elements of the block driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  block.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 92dd3fe..534e1bc 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -2407,6 +2407,11 @@ int bdrv_aio_multiwrite(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockRequest *reqs, int num_reqs)
>         return 0;
>     }
>
> +    /* don't submit writes if we don't have a medium */
> +    if (bs->drv == NULL) {
> +       return -1;
> +    }
> +

Most other bdrv_*() calls will error out immediately if !bs->drv.
Here you check only after returning success for num_reqs == 0.  I
don't think it makes a huge difference and can see how these semantics
are handy (saves caller checking for num_reqs == 0), but I wanted to
point it out.

More importantly, we're not obeying the contract of this function
here.  reqs[].error must be set to -ENOMEDIUM before returning -1.
Otherwise the caller thinks that reqs[] callbacks will still be
invoked in the future and cannot complete those requests.

Stefan

      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-03 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02 15:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't allow multiwrites against a block device without underlying medium Ryan Harper
2011-03-03 10:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTik_Fu=asjFSBSEijDFs1yMBexGy200k-7g-oGVt@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).