From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36857 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCuAS-0003wh-B0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 08:39:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <miguel.filho@gmail.com>) id 1OCuAP-0004HS-Fg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 08:39:03 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:56035)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <miguel.filho@gmail.com>) id 1OCuAP-0004HK-BH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 08:39:01 -0400
Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so572478wwb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 14 May 2010 05:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m3aas2ke8g.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
References: <20100513111809.551fdb12@redhat.com>
	<m3aas2ke8g.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:38:58 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTikpTihEMCDrCQCLbcwKuuA0WNuCeeqs6T7vVMQH@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] New Monitor command: 'info netdevices'
From: Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho <miguel.filho@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrot=
e:
>
> There's also
>
> 3. Convert it anyway. =A0Clean up the mess. =A0Change the output.
>

I agree.

It seams to me that no one is concerned with any Monitor output change
with this particular command.

Plus, no one have shown any concerns about the problems I've found in
net/socket.c reported previously either.