* [Qemu-devel] sparc mmu
@ 2010-05-29 21:33 Artyom Tarasenko
2010-05-30 11:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Artyom Tarasenko @ 2010-05-29 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blue Swirl; +Cc: Bob Breuer, qemu-devel
2010/5/29 Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>:
> Robert Reif did some improvements to SuperSparc emulation, but the
> work was not finished. That should be a good starting point.
Do you mean the last patch he sent to us or are there some earlier
unapplied patches?
The last patch _seems_ to be mainly refactoring and disabling features
which are not
presented in certain models. I might have missed something of course:
the patch is large.
For me is also interesting what do we miss in the microSPARC implementation.
If I switch off POST (which crashes due to the known FPU problems)
LX/CX/X OBPs hang. Looks like it's expecting some interrupt (the SS-5
OBP escapes a similar endless loop on a timer irq), but not getting
it.
Do you know anything obvious qemu is missing in LX machine?
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: sparc mmu
2010-05-29 21:33 [Qemu-devel] sparc mmu Artyom Tarasenko
@ 2010-05-30 11:32 ` Blue Swirl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Blue Swirl @ 2010-05-30 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Artyom Tarasenko; +Cc: Bob Breuer, qemu-devel
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
<atar4qemu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2010/5/29 Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>:
>> Robert Reif did some improvements to SuperSparc emulation, but the
>> work was not finished. That should be a good starting point.
>
> Do you mean the last patch he sent to us or are there some earlier
> unapplied patches?
The last one.
> The last patch _seems_ to be mainly refactoring and disabling features
> which are not
> presented in certain models. I might have missed something of course:
> the patch is large.
>
> For me is also interesting what do we miss in the microSPARC implementation.
> If I switch off POST (which crashes due to the known FPU problems)
> LX/CX/X OBPs hang. Looks like it's expecting some interrupt (the SS-5
> OBP escapes a similar endless loop on a timer irq), but not getting
> it.
> Do you know anything obvious qemu is missing in LX machine?
I don't have a device tree for LX, but unimplemented interrupt sources
could be audio, parallel port, video, modem. Floppy may be buggy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-30 11:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-29 21:33 [Qemu-devel] sparc mmu Artyom Tarasenko
2010-05-30 11:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).