From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50071 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OcNrP-0006Dq-Jn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1OcNrO-0006kf-FR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:43 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:54301)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>) id 1OcNrO-0006kV-8q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:42 -0400
Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so215477pzk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikD7Z-0QhbrjvL4o8c6zxdH+iPYvewdecBAT+Cx@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinMquF1oXgDg5fyKNF1Rxcz2_vMSvJmyH7E46bi@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimyuF6ZNaWXar2qYwC_tl4pclCu136dH8wpa9xM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTili9UdnzkpKh-YBhARzI-1NWewuvf1b3pH-5Zd9@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=0Jv=3X09G4PcxaP3ZZ1JrrzSwxHQFXi_Crq6_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikD7Z-0QhbrjvL4o8c6zxdH+iPYvewdecBAT+Cx@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:24:02 +0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimP7x+u-EEgr6Gs4yjVoemy5RYkR3BNiKYM1C=9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] memory trace with qemu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Cruz <eduardohmdacruz@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 15:39, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> The performance of these backends is different. =A0If performance is a
> top concern, then the "ust" backend is probably the way to go. =A0See
> http://lttng.org/ust for more info.


Oh wow, so let me put it another way: it's using LTTng? neat!

--=20
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com