From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50441 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PikFU-0001av-SX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:04:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PikFM-0000ur-Eb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:04:08 -0500 Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:35670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PikFM-0000uh-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:04:00 -0500 Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so1098263gwa.4 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:04:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D41A811.9080004@codemonkey.ws> References: <4D412CF0.30706@redhat.com> <4D419DB6.6000707@codemonkey.ws> <201101271044.00845.rickv@hobi.com> <4D41A811.9080004@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:50:02 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] fix crash when a read handler calls qemu_set_fd_handler2() From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wr= ote: > On 01/27/2011 10:44 AM, Rick Vernam wrote: >>>> >>>> Please reply to this message with a subject starting with "[PING 0.14]= " >>>> and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or "[PULL 0.14]" for tree >>>> pulls. =A0Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also sta= rt >>>> having "[PATCH 0.14]", too. >>>> >> >> I am not the author of this patch, but it fixed a crash that was bugging >> me >> consistently. >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/62420/ >> > > Stefan, I thought we're carryign a patch from you that fixes this problem= ? > =A0Am I mistaken? Yes, that crash was fixed in qemu.git by 0290b57bdfec83ca78b6d119ea9847bb17943328 "Delete IOHandlers after potentially running them". To be fair Corentin and Yoshiaki seemed in favor of applying this one regardless: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/80335/ Stefan