From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45154 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OOx6I-0006jB-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:12:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOx6G-0006xU-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:12:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f173.google.com ([74.125.83.173]:35678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OOx6G-0006xQ-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:12:32 -0400 Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so2458588pvg.4 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:12:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1276703160-7894-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1276703160-7894-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:12:05 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [CFR 0/10] QMP specification review (Part 2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Anthony Liguori , Luiz Capitulino , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > This is the second set of commands as part of the QMP specification review. > Please comment on the individual commands specifications and Anthony and I will > try to fold the comments back into the command documentation. Should the specification also list possible errors? Are there any return values?