From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36264 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIn7D-0001tb-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 14:20:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIn7B-0004yf-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:33536) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIn7B-0004yZ-IF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 14:20:01 -0400 Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so507133pwi.4 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 11:20:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100530180545.GA30132@redhat.com> References: <20100530155000.GA30051@redhat.com> <20100530180545.GA30132@redhat.com> From: Blue Swirl Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 18:19:40 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] pci, vhost fixes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 04:56:11PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wro= te: >> > The following changes since commit 259d5577ae546de27e25a40710f81aa0316= 60de8: >> > >> > =C2=A0lsi: Fix value overflow in request tag processing (2010-05-22 15= :32:32 +0200) >> > >> > are available in the git repository at: >> > =C2=A0git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu.git pci >> > >> > Isaku Yamahata (4): >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0pci: clean up of pci_set_default_subsystem_id(). >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0pci: add const to pci_is_express(), pci_config_siz= e(). >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0pci.h: remove unused constants. >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0msix: remove duplicated defines. >> > >> > Michael S. Tsirkin (1): >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0vhost: fix build broken by 0bfcd599e3f5c5679cc7d01= 65a0a1822e2f60de2 >> >> Nack, see 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb. > > Did you follow the discussion about that patch before applying? > 29f91781bd300b228d9c38b9f6c1e0b6a38f25fb does not make sense > to me, I think it should be reverted. > we have long long value, let us just print with %ll. > casting to uint64 and printing with PRi64 is silly. We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The discussion about that was earlier.