From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaKTC-0003o5-Ou for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:27:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaKT6-0000lO-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:27:46 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:52390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaKT6-0000l2-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:27:40 -0400 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so1700369gyg.4 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:27:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E054935.4060406@rwth-aachen.de> References: <4E054935.4060406@rwth-aachen.de> From: Mulyadi Santosa Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:26:59 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU timing requirements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:34, felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently implementing some heuristics using a patched qemu > (i386-softmmu). Two of them take some time for each vm memory access. If I > run them both, suddenly qemu segfaults while executing a BBL. Using just one > of them never triggers this problem. "Two" instances of Qemu running at the same time, you mean? -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com