From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qatbq-0002la-73 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:59:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qatbo-0007km-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:59:02 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:53681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qatbo-0007ki-PF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:59:00 -0400 Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so2363568qwj.4 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:59:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Blue Swirl Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:58:40 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SPARC64 support on FreeBSD, has it improved as of yet? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Super Bisquit Cc: qemu-devel On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: > The last time I asked, Blue Swirl was somewhat working on the port. > Has anything been improved since? I'm somewhat working on OpenBSD host support, not FreeBSD, but there shouldn't be great differences. What's the status on FreeBSD, does QEMU build and run?