From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:52:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ONYRPp1_RHRUkseDWcYAJXevZTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0B1399.4050807@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure if I should suggest writeback or none as the new
> default, but I think it could make sense to change it.
I agree that cache=none is safe and fast with correct guests and local
disks. It is beaten by cache=writeback in cases where the host has a
lot of buffer cache to play with and the guest has very little - for
example when running qemu without a -m argument. If I was running
qemu-system-arm I might like cache=writeback. If I was virtualizing
x86 servers I might like cache=none.
cache=none as a default - which some management tools inherit - would
be reasonable. Folks using command-line qemu can always tweak to use
cache=writeback or even cache=unsafe if performance matters but data
integrity does not.
Whether it is safe to transition to cache=none or not depends on what
broken guests are still widely deployed. Does CentOS 5 flush the disk
cache?
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 11:59 [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 12:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 12:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 12:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:17 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-06-29 14:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 15:07 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-06-29 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 16:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-29 13:53 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-06-29 14:11 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 12:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 15:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 12:21 ` Alexander Graf
2011-06-29 13:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-29 14:05 ` Alexander Graf
2011-06-29 12:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2011-06-29 13:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 13:00 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:11 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=ONYRPp1_RHRUkseDWcYAJXevZTg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=Qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).