From: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] raw-posix: Re-open host CD-ROM after media change
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:12:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=SY7pbELSnkULR4fL-C3uOUehoWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik1LNYoJ6O2C+bPM80LBx8bGnr+uw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Piggy-back on the guest CD-ROM polling to poll on the host. Open and
>> close the host CD-ROM file descriptor to ensure we read the new size and
>> not a stale size.
>>
>> Two things are going on here:
>>
>> 1. If hald/udisks is not already polling CD-ROMs on the host then
>> re-opening the CD-ROM causes the host to read the new medium's size.
>>
>> 2. There is a bug in Linux which means the CD-ROM file descriptor must
>> be re-opened in order for lseek(2) to see the new size. The
>> inode size gets out of sync with the underlying device (which you can
>> confirm by checking that /sys/block/sr0/size and lseek(2) do not
>> match after media change). I have raised this with the
>> maintainers but we need a workaround for the foreseeable future.
>>
>> Note that these changes are all in a #ifdef __linux__ section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> block/raw-posix.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c b/block/raw-posix.c
>> index 6b72470..8b5205c 100644
>> --- a/block/raw-posix.c
>> +++ b/block/raw-posix.c
>> @@ -1238,10 +1238,28 @@ static int cdrom_is_inserted(BlockDriverState *bs)
>> BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ret = ioctl(s->fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT);
>> - if (ret == CDS_DISC_OK)
>> - return 1;
>> - return 0;
>> + /*
>> + * Close the file descriptor if no medium is present and open it to poll
>> + * again. This ensures the medium size is refreshed. If the file
>> + * descriptor is kept open the size can become stale. This is essentially
>> + * replicating CD-ROM polling but is driven by the guest. As the guest
>> + * polls, we poll the host.
>> + */
>> +
>> + if (s->fd == -1) {
>> + s->fd = qemu_open(bs->filename, s->open_flags, 0644);
>> + if (s->fd < 0) {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = (ioctl(s->fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT) == CDS_DISC_OK);
>> +
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + close(s->fd);
>> + s->fd = -1;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static int cdrom_eject(BlockDriverState *bs, int eject_flag)
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>>
>>
>>
>
> There is an issue with reopening host devices in QEMU when running
> under libvirt. It appears that libvirt chowns image files (including
> device nodes) so that the launched QEMU process can access them.
>
> Unfortunately after media change on host devices udev will reset the
> ownership of the device node. This causes open(2) to fail with EACCES
> since the QEMU process does not have the right uid/gid/groups and
> libvirt is unaware that the file's ownership has changed.
>
> In order for media change to work with Linux host CD-ROM it is
> necessary to reopen the file (otherwise the inode size will not
> refresh, this is an issue with existing kernels).
>
> How can libvirt's security model be made to support this case? In
> theory udev could be temporarily configured with libvirt permissions
> for the CD-ROM device while passed through to the guest, but is that
> feasible?
How about something like this: Add an explicit reopen method to
BlockDriver. Make a special block device for passed file descriptors.
Pass descriptors in libvirt for CD-ROMs instead of the device paths.
The reopen method for file descriptors should notify libvirt about
need to pass a reopened descriptor and then block all accesses until a
new descriptor is available. This should also solve your earlier
problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-03 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 19:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: Correct size across CD-ROM media change Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-03-29 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] trace: Trace bdrv_set_locked() Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-03-29 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Do not cache device size for removable media Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-03-29 19:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] raw-posix: Re-open host CD-ROM after media change Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-03-31 10:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2011-04-01 14:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-03 11:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-03 13:12 ` Blue Swirl [this message]
2011-04-03 18:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-04 10:47 ` [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2011-04-04 12:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-04 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-04 13:16 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-04-04 14:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-04 14:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-04-04 14:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-04 16:38 ` Blue Swirl
2011-04-04 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04 13:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-04 13:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-04 15:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-04 15:11 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05 6:41 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-05 7:48 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05 8:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-05 9:00 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05 9:12 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-05 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05 9:26 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-06 8:07 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-05 8:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-05 8:58 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-04 17:54 ` David Ahern
2011-04-05 5:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-05 5:42 ` David Ahern
2011-04-05 12:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-03-30 8:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: Correct size across CD-ROM " Markus Armbruster
2011-03-30 10:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=SY7pbELSnkULR4fL-C3uOUehoWg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).