From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRZts-000185-Oy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:07:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRZtr-0001FR-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:07:08 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:48669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRZtr-0001FJ-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:07:07 -0400 Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so5574518iwl.4 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:07:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Wei Liu Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:06:36 +0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Question on virtio disk maximum index and maximum partition List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, all. I'm programming for virtio disk support in Xen tool stack. I would like to know the limitation of virtio disk. That is, what's the maximum number of disks supported through virtio bus, and what's the maximum number of partitions supported per disk. If I'm posting to the wrong list, please point me the right direction. Thanks. -- Best regards Wei Liu Twitter: @iliuw Site: http://liuw.name