From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbs04-0006SR-9f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:28:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbs02-0007h3-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:28:04 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:40135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbs01-0007gv-Rc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:28:02 -0400 Received: by gxk26 with SMTP id 26so479243gxk.4 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:28:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1309333045.40815.YahooMailRC@web77917.mail.sg1.yahoo.com> References: <1309333045.40815.YahooMailRC@web77917.mail.sg1.yahoo.com> From: Mulyadi Santosa Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:27:20 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu performance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TMOqIMSQ4bupYyBUw6Bp?= Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.orgDevelopers" Hi... :) 2011/6/29 L=C3=AA =C4=90=E1=BB=A9c T=C3=A0i : > Hi, > I have a question about performance of Qemu for powerpc. > When I'm changing the CPU clock for taihu board from 33Mhz to 330Mhz by > setting the PLL value, the performance of Guest OS is not increased. I us= e > nbench to measure the guest performance. > Is qemu always running as maximum performance? Yes... Logically, nbench is just pressing out all of your processor can do (CPU bound tasks). In this case, emulated guest processor clock has very little meaning IMO. After all, AFAIK it's just a complimentary info so it is seen as "real processor". --=20 regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com