From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUK6T-0006I4-5E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:51:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUK6N-0003z7-IX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:51:28 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:65405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUK6N-0003xR-0m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:51:23 -0400 Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so291646pzk.4 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:51:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DEF8997.7050108@siemens.com> References: <4DEF8997.7050108@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:51:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Add kernel header update script List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marcelo Tosatti , Alexander Graf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Avi Kivity , Christoph Hellwig 2011/6/8 Jan Kiszka : > On 2011-06-08 16:33, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 8 June 2011 15:10, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> +tmpdir=$TMPDIR/.tmp-hdrs-$$ >> >> Better (safer) to use mktemp, I think. > > Is that portable? I don't think so. We don't expect every random end user to run this script, though, right? We already use mktemp in scripts/refresh-pxe-roms.sh, for instance. -- PMM