From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46328)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <balrogg@gmail.com>) id 1QQV8j-000496-8t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 21:50:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <balrogg@gmail.com>) id 1QQV8i-0000cz-1D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 21:50:01 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinbdHYTdPgmZHwUBOb4xEmA=mjHnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <yf9sjryq3gn.fsf@chiyo.mc.pp.se>
	<BANLkTinbdHYTdPgmZHwUBOb4xEmA=mjHnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 03:49:57 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikEz_JrJ38iONRf0f_bqGXHVaSLDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: andrzej zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] bitbang_i2c: Fix spurious
 slave read after NACK
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcus Comstedt <marcus@mc.pp.se>

Hi,

On 28 May 2011 21:52, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Comstedt <marcus@mc.pp.se> wrote:
>> After NACKing a read operation, a raising SCL should not trigger a new
>> read from the slave. =C2=A0Introduce a new state which just waits for a =
stop
>> or start condition after NACK.

Makes sense, I pushed this change to master.

Cheers