From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6KBx-000322-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 06:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6KBs-0002NH-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 06:05:57 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:38957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6KBs-0002ND-QC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 06:05:52 -0400 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so4127394vws.4 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 03:05:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D9840D7.1070209@mail.berlios.de> References: <1301605129-12808-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> <4D9840D7.1070209@mail.berlios.de> From: Blue Swirl Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:05:32 +0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] w32: Fix compilation of new code List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 03.04.2011 11:10, schrieb Blue Swirl: >> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Stefan Weil >> wrote: >>> >>> Some recently added new code did not compile for w32 targets. >>> >>> The functions qemu_iohandler_fill and qemu_iohandler_poll need >>> data type fd_set which is declared in winsock2.h for w32 targets. >>> >>> Moving the functions from qemu-common.h to qemu_socket.h fixes >>> compilations for w32 without adding a new include file to qemu-common.h. >> >> There's nothing socket specific in qemu_iohandler_fill and >> qemu_iohandler_poll, so I'd rather fix qemu-common.h. But I have a >> patch in my working queue to move OS specific stuff to qemu-common.h, >> I'll fix this there. > > > Adding a new file iohandler.h for these functions would also solve the > problem. > Or maybe there is an include file which is better suited than qemu_socket.h. > > I think that functions which are only used in one file and declared > in another file should not be in qemu-common.h. In this special case, > all code which uses qemu-common.h would also require winsock2.h > just because of fd_set! There are a lot of include directives already in qemu-common.h. I see qemu-common.h as a library of useful stuff that may be used anywhere in QEMU. The opposite approach is to sprinkle all .c files with specific set of include directives for just that file. > By the way: there is one file qemu_*.h, and there are 25 files qemu-*.h. > What about renaming qemu_socket.h to qemu-socket.h? There are a lot of files in both conventions.