From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44700 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q8w6W-0008Q9-BK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:59:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8w6U-0006Tp-LJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:59:08 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:54211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8w6U-0006Ta-JB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:59:06 -0400 Received: by vxb41 with SMTP id 41so4206484vxb.4 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:59:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110410132415.GA6719@volta.aurel32.net> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:59:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error From: Peter Maydell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Artyom Tarasenko Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel , Aurelien Jarno On 10 April 2011 15:09, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > Does it mean the last block is processed correctly and the crash > happens on the next instruction which doesn't make it to the log? ...maybe tcg_abort() should do a qemu_log_flush()...? -- PMM