From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QahIw-0007Pz-Dd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:50:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QahIp-0004kd-A1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:50:42 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:35254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QahIp-0004kS-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:50:35 -0400 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so1994793yxs.4 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:50:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E06613D.8020603@rwth-aachen.de> References: <4E054935.4060406@rwth-aachen.de> <4E060C98.30706@rwth-aachen.de> <4E06613D.8020603@rwth-aachen.de> From: Mulyadi Santosa Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:49:54 +0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU timing requirements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 05:29, felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen wrote: > Think I found the problem. It was a bug in my code and because of some weird > circumstances, backtrace and addresses seemed to be a segfault in a BBL. glad you find it..... care to share to everyone what's really goin' on? who knows it will reveal somekind of hidden problem in Qemu/TCG.... -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com