From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40738 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6iqN-0003iI-BQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:25:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Q6iqG-0000pC-PI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:25:13 -0400
Received: from mail-vx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:34777)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Q6iqG-0000ow-N3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:25:12 -0400
Received: by vxb41 with SMTP id 41so4692846vxb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 05:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1301919339-13464-3-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
References: <1301919339-13464-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<1301919339-13464-3-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:25:11 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTikf92TwwLdZUCsACfzeUbMCd=7P8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Basic implementation of Sharp Zaurus
	SL-5500 collie PDA
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 4 April 2011 13:15, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0s =3D sa1110_init(collie_binfo.ram_size, cpu_model);
> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0(void) s;

Is this "(void) s" needed now, or is it a leftover from before code to
use s later in the function was added, maybe?

-- PMM