From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QB1Gp-00056Z-UV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:54:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QB1Gp-0006K8-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:54:23 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:48136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QB1Gp-0006K2-3t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:54:23 -0400 Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so1697926yxk.4 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 01:54:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201104161027.29234.bradh@frogmouth.net> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:54:22 +0100 Message-ID: From: Stefan Hajnoczi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Para-virtualized ram-based filesystem? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stuart.Ritchie@tellabs.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Brad Hards Resent because Stuart dropped from the recipients list. On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote= : > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Brad Hards wrote: >> On Saturday 16 April 2011 09:58:32 Ritchie, Stuart wrote: >>> How does that sound? >> As a general user: Confusing. >> >> Is there a concrete example (specific applications, specific performance= issues, >> specific requirements) that you can share? > > I'm also wondering why you want this. > > Does it matter if the files get pushed out to swap on the host? > > It's tempting to take advantage of running virtualized but then things > like migration get in the way. =A0Have you actually tried out network > file systems and determined they won't work for some reason? > > Stefan >