From: Anup Patel <757702@bugs.launchpad.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 757702] Re: Undefined instruction exception starts at offset 0x8 instead of 0x4
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:10:43 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikpXhLedQt4DQth7uZcg4vcj2V1aA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110412114242.24274.9945.malone@wampee.canonical.com
I see 0x00000008 ().
I am using qemu-0.14.0.tar.gz available for QEMU Downloads.
--Anup
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Peter Maydell
<peter.maydell@linaro.org>wrote:
> > Also, in the test case hits 0x8 after encountering UNDEF instruction
> at 0x100058.
>
> So if you run qemu like this:
> qemu-system-arm -M realview-pb-a8 -serial stdio -kernel arm_test.elf -s -S
>
> and run arm-none-gnueabi-gdb with no arguments and in gdb type these
> commands:
>
> (gdb) target remote :1234
> Remote debugging using :1234
> 0x00100000 in ?? ()
> (gdb) break *0x4
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x4
> (gdb) break *0x8
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x8
> (gdb) c
> Continuing.
>
> ...what does gdb do?
> (For me it says "Breakpoint 1, 0x00000004 in ?? ()" which is what I
> expect.)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757702
>
> Title:
> Undefined instruction exception starts at offset 0x8 instead of 0x4
>
> Status in QEMU:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> ARMv7a has lot of undefined instruction from its instruction opcode
> space. This undefined instructions are very useful for replacing
> sensitive non-priviledged instructions of guest operating systems
> (virtualization). The undefined instruction exception executes at
> <exception_base> + 0x4, where <exception_base> can be 0x0 or
> 0xfff00000. Currently, in qemu 0.14.0 undefined instruction fault at
> 0x8 offset instead of 0x4. This was not a problem with qemu 0.13.0,
> seems like this is a new bug. As as example, if we try to execute
> value "0xec019800" in qemu 0.14.0 then it should cause undefined
> exception at <exception_base>+0x4 since "0xec019800" is an undefined
> instruction.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/757702/+subscribe
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757702
Title:
Undefined instruction exception starts at offset 0x8 instead of 0x4
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
ARMv7a has lot of undefined instruction from its instruction opcode
space. This undefined instructions are very useful for replacing
sensitive non-priviledged instructions of guest operating systems
(virtualization). The undefined instruction exception executes at
<exception_base> + 0x4, where <exception_base> can be 0x0 or
0xfff00000. Currently, in qemu 0.14.0 undefined instruction fault at
0x8 offset instead of 0x4. This was not a problem with qemu 0.13.0,
seems like this is a new bug. As as example, if we try to execute
value "0xec019800" in qemu 0.14.0 then it should cause undefined
exception at <exception_base>+0x4 since "0xec019800" is an undefined
instruction.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 16:12 [Qemu-devel] [Bug 757702] [NEW] Undefined instruction exception starts at offset 0x8 instead of 0x4 Anup Patel
2011-04-12 9:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 757702] " Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 9:29 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 9:30 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 9:43 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 10:18 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-12 10:38 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-12 10:49 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 11:03 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-12 11:10 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-12 11:16 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 11:42 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-12 12:10 ` Anup Patel [this message]
2011-04-12 12:27 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-13 4:34 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-13 11:54 ` Peter Maydell
2011-04-13 15:57 ` Anup Patel
2011-04-13 16:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 757702] Re: ARM: singlestepping insn which UNDEFs should stop at UNDEF vector insn, not after it Peter Maydell
2017-05-19 19:42 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-19 4:17 ` Launchpad Bug Tracker
2018-11-27 16:32 ` Peter Maydell
2020-08-20 14:59 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikpXhLedQt4DQth7uZcg4vcj2V1aA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=757702@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).