From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41571)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1QDvh5-0000Jv-W0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:33:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1QDvh5-00089e-5P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:33:31 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:40841)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1QDvh5-00089N-1c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 05:33:31 -0400
Received: by ywl41 with SMTP id 41so536246ywl.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DB3C204.1030400@redhat.com>
References: <20110406183341.22854.93929.stgit@ginnungagap.bsc.es>
	<20110406183503.22854.39534.stgit@ginnungagap.bsc.es>
	<BANLkTikTv7-sFKfqU36iSkpwL_ZAq=p_nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DB3C204.1030400@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:33:28 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimR+U4uSnYXguw=nf2mv_osiw6tnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] trace-state: [stderr] add support
 for dynamically enabling/disabling events
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= <xscript@gmx.net>, chouteau@adacore.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/23/2011 04:31 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> For tracing use cases that require performance or runtime
>> enabling/disabling trace events, just use the simple, ust, or dtrace
>> backends.
>
> Having -trace events for the stderr backend would still be nice.

That should be doable without ifdefing and duplicating simpletrace.
The tracer and monitor command parts of simpletrace need to be
separated from common TraceEvent and tracetool generation, which can
be reused by stderr.

Stefan