From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36784 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6hqT-0005gT-RE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:21:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Q6hqS-0000WF-Ii
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:21:21 -0400
Received: from mail-vx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:44335)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Q6hqS-0000Vv-Ee
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:21:20 -0400
Received: by vxb41 with SMTP id 41so4653035vxb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 04:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=d_-9cRH_x6G6scC2xwPNAJJCM1Wx5do-fHNvU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1301485265-8100-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=CxBdkPvvfXYMENyXaRFKZPRVnDQ8E7eEujw6S@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=g+5XADWPtyid=WnY7fbqowUmjuZLfjrgJBeed@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=d_-9cRH_x6G6scC2xwPNAJJCM1Wx5do-fHNvU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:21:19 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimSkHVf-a-CkC+ifGs2O_ww8KebyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm: basic support for ARMv4/ARMv4T
	emulation
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 2 April 2011 16:25, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/31/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, it seems so :)
>> Please commit the fixed patch.
>
> Do I need to send the fixed patchset?

I think that would probably be best.

-- PMM