From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPOVh-0005k3-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:33:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPOVg-0005Oa-Ae for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:33:09 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:60946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPOVg-0005OV-7o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:33:08 -0400 Received: by iym10 with SMTP id 10so239999iym.4 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 17:33:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:33:07 +1000 Message-ID: From: Matthew Fernandez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu log path command line options List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi all, I was planning on sending a patch to allow you to specify the log file location on the command line (as opposed to having it hard coded to /tmp/qemu.log). As this seems like a relatively straightforward feature to me, I was wondering if there was some philosophical reason why it's never been implemented. Please let me know if there are any objections to this feature. If not, I'll send through the patch when I've pulled together the relevant changes. Note, I'm not on the mailing list, so please CC me directly when replying. Thanks, Matthew