From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIpx-0002cb-BM for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIpq-0005bI-SK for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:38257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIpq-0005b1-8c for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:14 -0400 Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so253730pzk.4 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:30:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DEF7633.8050003@redhat.com> References: <4DEF7633.8050003@redhat.com> From: Fam Zheng Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:29:52 +0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vmdk fails qemu-iotest 019 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Qemu-devel@nongnu.org Yes I noticed the failure, but it's trivial mismatch between `qemu-img create` output. The old test case has "cluster_size=65536" but I find the latest qemu-img omits this info, as the diff: -Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=6442450944 cluster_size=65536 +Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=6442450944 Is this your case too? On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Hi Fam, > > now that I had a VMDK patch in the queue for the first time since quite > a while, I ran qemu-iotests for VMDK and I noticed that test case 019 > fails. It doesn't seem to be a regression, even 0.14 and 0.13 fail it. > > I think you're running qemu-iotests to check your VMDK patches, so I > wonder if you have already looked into this? > > Kevin > -- Best regards! Fam Zheng