From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36090)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1Qa2q7-0000qW-SF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:38:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1Qa2q6-00048Z-PR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:38:15 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:48784)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1Qa2q6-00048V-IW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:38:14 -0400
Received: by qwj8 with SMTP id 8so1536013qwj.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201106241235.35336.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
References: <201106240644.02325.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikCR5342Yd2fCJGDWS8Jny+L+qjfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201106241235.35336.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:38:13 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimu3=K6E3hHm_gPD_vMhDRuFMRMbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Actual TB code doesn't look like what was intended
 (TCG issue)?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I've noticed it (however, after I sent this mail).
> But (1) quoted OUT is the last OUT for this host address range in the log and (2) in gdb I set "b tlb_fill if retaddr == 0x4000a369" and made some steps.
> You mean that I should look at previous OUTs for this address range?

That should be the last block matching the address in the
log output if you run *under gdb* with -d out_asm.

BTW you say this is a clean build, but as far as I could see
it looks like your emulated target is not part of standard
QEMU;  it seems to have a register named 'ar9'.  Did I
miss something or is it some non public target? ia64?


Laurent