From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPubP-0004VE-JO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:49:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPubO-0005lV-JO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:49:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:35814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPubO-0005lH-C7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:49:10 -0400 Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so771004pzk.4 for ; Fri, 27 May 2011 03:49:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110527104727.GA19158@lst.de> References: <20110527104727.GA19158@lst.de> From: Feiran Zheng Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:48:49 +0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotest: test 005, don't run on raw List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Does this mean one must have that large fs space? On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:45:03PM +0800, Feiran Zheng wrote: >> Patch on qemu-iotest. >> >> 005, test of creating 5TB images, not practical on raw format, so not run on it. > > It's perfectly fine on raw, just try it. > > -- Best regards! Fam Zheng