From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHBUi-000820-BM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:02:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHBUh-0000bf-5K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:02:12 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:62195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHBUh-0000bZ-2y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 05:02:11 -0400 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so5635860vws.4 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1303722395-10791-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 13:02:09 +0400 Message-ID: From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH 1/9] pxa2xx_pcmcia: qdevify List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, colleagues, On 4/29/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > Any chance to get any response for this patches serie? Still no response at all. Is there anything wrong with my approach? Is there any problem with patch format? Am I just being ignored? > On 4/25/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Use qdev insfrastructure for managing PXA PCMCIA devices. PCMCIA bus >> itself isn't converted to QBus (yet). pxa2xx_pcmcia_init() function is >> moved to pcmcia.h as it will be used by other cores/devices (like >> StrongARM). >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry > -- With best wishes Dmitry